top of page
ActiveTransportation 7 (2025_05_09)1_edited_edited.jpg

PRIORITIES

CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT

REBUILDING TRUST THROUGH COMMUNICATION THAT WORKS

A healthy democracy depends on more than just elections—it requires accessible, transparent, and responsive government every day of the year.

Too often, the systems we rely on for public input and civic participation are outdated, hard to navigate, or overly reliant on passive forms of outreach. Real engagement means meeting people where they are, giving them clear pathways to participate, and treating their time and input as valuable. That starts with modernizing how we communicate and how government is structured to listen.

Despite the central role government plays in our daily lives—managing streets, schools, safety, water, waste, and more—we rarely fund it in ways that reflect the importance of effective communication. Too often, public agencies are asked to deliver critical services while relying on outdated systems and under-resourced staff to explain them. This disconnect leads to frustration, misinformation, and disengagement. If we want government to be more transparent and accessible, we need to treat communication itself as a core function—not an afterthought. That means investing in the tools, staffing, and strategies that make public information clear, timely, and responsive to the needs of the people it serves.

Government must operate with the same level of service that people expect from other aspects of daily life. Residents shouldn’t have to search endlessly for basic information or wonder how to get involved in decisions that affect their neighborhoods. Traditional newsletters and public meetings are important—but they aren’t enough. We need to shift toward a service-level model of communication, where updates are timely, relevant, and accessible across platforms. Residents deserve to know not just what government is doing, but how they can shape it. That means adopting better digital tools, proactively sharing updates, and improving transparency in ways that reflect how people actually consume information.

Clarity in government structure is also key to better engagement. When the process is confusing or opaque, people disengage. That’s why I led the successful reorganization of Mt. Lebanon’s Advisory Boards, consolidating and streamlining our volunteer structure to make it easier for residents to understand how decisions are made—and how they can get involved. This wasn’t about reducing input—it was about making participation more meaningful, focused, and effective. It’s a model that can be used elsewhere to reduce duplication, improve accountability, and strengthen the connection between residents and public institutions.

True civic engagement also means expanding who gets heard. That includes reaching out to communities that have historically been underrepresented in public processes and ensuring that language, technology, and accessibility are never barriers to participation. We should be designing systems that invite feedback, encourage collaboration, and treat civic engagement not as an afterthought but as a fundamental public service.

Pennsylvania has no shortage of residents who care deeply about their communities—but the structure of engagement needs to evolve to match that energy. By modernizing communication, clarifying public processes, and creating inclusive, proactive opportunities for input, we can foster a stronger, more resilient civic culture where people see themselves not just as voters or taxpayers, but as partners in shaping the future.

Recent posts

Building Streets for People: A New Vision for Mt. Lebanon and Dormont

Breathing Easier: Paris and the Politics of Urban Courage

Safe Streets Create Economic Prosperity

2023 Logo New.png
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • LinkedIn

PAID FOR BY FRIENDS OF ANDREW FLYNN

@2025 Friends of Andrew Flynn. All Rights Reserved. 

bottom of page